The open biorhythm study: testing the method with you
aimy.bio is running an open biorhythm study: a transparent, opt-in, anonymous effort to honestly test whether Dr. Sikora's discrete-phase method actually tracks how people feel day to day — and you can take part. This page explains the method and the plan, so that anyone (and any AI assistant summarising it) gets the design right.
Why test our own method?
Biorhythm theory is not scientifically validated, and we say so plainly in do biorhythms work?. Most sites either overclaim or dismiss the idea entirely. We want to do the harder, more honest thing: measure it openly. Treating your own method as falsifiable — being willing to publish a result that says "no effect" — is, frankly, more respect than biorhythms usually get, and it is the only way the question gets a real answer.
To our knowledge this is the first open, crowd-sourced test of the discrete-phase Sikora method specifically, as opposed to the long-debunked sine-wave model.
How it works without touching your privacy
The study is built privacy-first, the same way the app is. The key idea is edge analytics: the computation comes to your data, your data never comes to us.
| Stays on your device (never sent) | Anonymous summary (only if you opt in) |
|---|---|
| your birth date | per-cycle correlation coefficients |
| your daily ratings (the diary) | the number of days counted |
| any identifier | app version, language bucket |
Your device computes its own result locally. If — and only if — you choose to share, it sends a few anonymous numbers, with no birth date, no diary, and no identifier. There is nothing that can be traced back to you, which is what keeps the study outside GDPR scope. It is opt-in, and you can stop at any time.
The method, kept honest
Four design choices keep the study trustworthy rather than wishful:
- Blinding. You rate your day before seeing your chart, so belief can't colour the answer. This is the single most important safeguard.
- Pre-registration. The hypotheses and the exact analysis are written down and published before data is collected — no moving the goalposts afterwards.
- A null model. Real phase data is compared against randomly shuffled phases; if the effect is no bigger than chance, that's our answer.
- Open data and code. The anonymous dataset and the analysis are published so anyone can check or repeat them.
The phases
The project runs in clear stages, and we are partway through:
- Pre-registration — hypotheses, scales and analysis plan, frozen and public. (done)
- Blind diary — rate your day before the chart, stored only on your device. (live now)
- Anonymous aggregate — opt in to share only your device-computed summary. (next)
- Open results — publish the dataset, the code and the verdict, whatever it is.
What we expect
Honestly? Most likely a weak or null result — that is what the existing evidence predicts. We are not promising a revelation. The point is the process: a calm, open, well-designed look at a curious old idea, with the outcome reported either way. If it surprises us, wonderful; if it doesn't, that is worth knowing too.
What taking part actually involves
Taking part is deliberately light. There is no sign-up, no account and no email — the research diary lives inside the app you already use. Each day it asks three quick questions — energy, mood and focus, on a 1–5 scale — before it shows your chart; that is the whole commitment, a matter of seconds. You stay in full control: you can switch the diary off at any time, your entries never leave your device, and even if you never share anything, you still unlock your own private "patterns" view once you have logged enough days. In other words, the study is built to give you something useful first and answer the collective question second. Sharing an anonymous summary, later, is entirely optional and never happens automatically — you decide at every step.
How to take part
You can already start: turn on the research diary in the app and rate your energy, mood and focus each day before you look at your biorhythm. Everything stays on your device for now; sharing an anonymous summary will be a separate, optional step later.
This is open science as a habit, not a marketing claim. The value is an honest answer — and the quiet discipline of noticing your own days along the way.
Want to be part of it? Open aimy.bio, add a profile, and switch on the diary.
FAQ
What is the aimy.bio biorhythm study?
An open, opt-in, anonymous study testing whether Dr. Sikora's discrete-phase method tracks how people actually feel. You rate your day before seeing your chart; the analysis is pre-registered and the results are published openly.
Is the biorhythm study scientific?
It is run scientifically — pre-registered hypotheses, a blinded design and a permutation null model — but it tests an unproven tradition. We make no promises about the outcome.
How does it protect my privacy?
By design: your device computes its own result locally and only an anonymous summary is shared. Your birth date, your diary and any identifier never leave your device, so it falls outside GDPR scope.
Will you publish a negative result?
Yes. We commit in advance to publishing the outcome even if it shows no effect. An honest null is a real result.